<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>i Care® Lasik Jakarta &#124; Lasik dan Katarak Center di Jakarta - Indonesia dengan teknologi terkini - Z-LASIK &#187; intralase</title>
	<atom:link href="http://icarelasik.co.id/tag/intralase/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://icarelasik.co.id</link>
	<description>LASIK dan Katarak Center di Jakarta Indonesia, Bedah Refraktif dengan Teknologi terkini, Z-Lasik with Advanced Aspheric dan wavefront lasik untuk mengoreksi kelainan Refraksi dan meningkatkan kwalitas penglihatan anda ada di jakarta indonesia.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:08:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>IntraLase vs Microkeratome</title>
		<link>http://icarelasik.co.id/2007/10/intralase-vs-microkeratome.html</link>
		<comments>http://icarelasik.co.id/2007/10/intralase-vs-microkeratome.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 02:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kastam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mikrokeratome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[femtosecond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intralase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lasik]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://icarelasik.co.id/2007/10/intralase-vs-microkeratome.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In your research on LASIK, the latest laser technologies, the risks and complications, you’ve probably seen debate on which is the better instrument to create the flap &#8211; the IntraLase laser or the microkeratome. You probably also noticed that the answer is not as simple as one or the other, as there are advantages and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In your research on LASIK, the latest laser technologies, the risks and complications, you’ve probably seen debate on which is the better instrument to create the flap &#8211; the IntraLase laser or the microkeratome. You probably also noticed that the answer is not as simple as one or the other, as there are advantages and disadvantages to both. </p>
<p>The IntraLase laser is a femtosecond laser, meaning that it’s an infrared laser that uses extremely short pulses of light. A femtosecond is a quadrillionth of a second. Such fantastic brevity enables extraodinary precision. A femtosecond laser can create a flap in corneas which are too thin for a microkeratome, and does it by creating microscopic bubbles across the desired location for the flap, at the exact depth required. The flap is then easily lifted and an excimer laser is used to do the actual reshaping of the cornea. </p>
<p>Advantages of the Microkeratome: </p>
<p>More comfortable for the patient<br />Faster recovery time<br />Less pain or discomfort<br />Less suction needed<br />Total treatment time is shorter than with IntraLase<br />No need for long-term steroid use  </p>
<p>(www.khannainstitute.com)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://icarelasik.co.id/2007/10/intralase-vs-microkeratome.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
